Skip to content
Edward Jones Investments logo

How to Decide How Much Company Stock to Hold (and Cap the Loss)

Written by the Edward Jones Investments team · Updated · 7-minute read
Father and adult daughter swapping golf clubs on a course path

You should decide how much company stock to hold by your spending, not by a percentage: hold only as much as a 50% drop could take without costing more than 2 years of household spending. For a $2 million household spending $150,000 annually, that caps one stock near $600,000. Half of $600,000 is $300,000, which equals 2 years of spending.

Take Carol, a hypothetical 48-year-old VP of engineering with $3 million in her employer's stock and one income. She first asks what percentage is safe, and that's the wrong unit. Ask instead how many years of spending a deep drop would wipe out, because that is the point where a paper loss becomes a cut to how the family lives.

Some things are unknown. Nobody can say whether your stock will fall 50%, and the 2-year line is a quick test, not a forecast. What doesn't change is the arithmetic: the size of the loss, divided by what your household spends each year, is a number you can check tonight.

Edward Jones Investments hears this question in first meetings with engineers who hold vested shares, unvested RSUs and ESPP lots, all tied to the one company that also pays them. This article walks through the test, the table, Carol's numbers and which lots to sell first. Every investment carries the risk of loss, including the money you originally put in.

How much company stock can your spending absorb?

Hold no more company stock than you could lose half of without giving up more than 2 years of household spending. The quick test: halve the position, divide by annual household spending, and keep the result at 2 years or less. A $600,000 position and $150,000 of spending gives $300,000 ÷ $150,000 = 2.0 years.

Carol (hypothetical) has $3 million in her employer's stock, and her portal balance makes the position look like a success story. She asked what percentage was safe. The answer was that a percentage ignores what her household actually spends, and spending is what a loss has to be paid out of. Before Edward Jones Investments suggests a sell-down size, it divides the 50% loss by the client's annual spending. A risk questionnaire answer doesn't set the number.

The table flips at the 30% row: at 30% of a $2 million household, a 50% drop erases exactly 2 years, and every row above it is over the line.

Recovery math makes the line more than a rule. A 50% loss needs a 100% gain to get back to even, and a 30% loss needs about 43%. Few employers double in a year, so the time to recover is long, and you keep spending the whole time. Carol decided to measure her position in years of spending from then on, because that was the unit her bills use.

Hypothetical $2 million household spending $150,000 annually; the employer's stock falls 50%
If one stock isA 50% drop removesYears of spending lostThen
70% ($1.4 million)$700,0004.7 yearsSell down before anything else
40% ($800,000)$400,0002.7 yearsSell about $200,000 on a schedule
30% ($600,000)$300,0002.0 yearsAt the line; sell new vests
20% ($400,000)$200,0001.3 yearsHold; keep counting unvested grants

Count every place your employer shows up

An employer's equity portal often lists vested shares only. Your 401(k) employer stock and unvested RSUs sit on separate statements, so someone who sees $1 million may really hold $1.4 million. Put 3 statements side by side (the equity portal, the 401(k) statement and the RSU vesting schedule) and add them up. Shares in the 401(k) count even though selling them there creates no current income tax.

Then add the paycheck. Salary, bonus and future grants all depend on the same company, and a falling share price and a layoff often arrive in the same quarter. For Carol, with one income, that means her job and her $3 million of stock carry one risk.

Carol (hypothetical, round numbers) spends about $200,000 annually and holds $3 million of stock. A 50% drop would erase $1.5 million, which is 7.5 years of spending ($1,500,000 ÷ $200,000). Under a 2-year cap she can lose at most $400,000 ($200,000 × 2), so she can hold no more than $800,000 of stock ($400,000 × 2, since the loss is half the position). That leaves $2.2 million to sell ($3,000,000 − $800,000).

Her 10b5-1 plan sells $275,000 a quarter for 8 quarters ($275,000 × 8 = $2,200,000), and each new RSU vest is sold as it lands so the position doesn't refill. She did the math before her trading window opened, which meant the plan was ready on day one. Proceeds fund her 2 college accounts first.

Her $50,000 annual gift goes to charity as shares held more than 1 year instead of cash. Donating appreciated stock has its own page, so that is all it gets here.

Which comes first, the 10b5-1 plan or the first sale?

Adopt the 10b5-1 plan first, because a sale made without one has to fit inside a short trading window. The cooling-off period is at least 30 days for most employees. Directors and officers wait the later of 90 days or 2 business days after the quarterly report, up to 120 days, so an officer who starts in a blackout may miss 2 windows.

Order matters inside the plan too. Old ESPP lots carry large gains, while recently vested RSUs have a basis near their vest-day value, so selling the RSUs first moves exposure with little tax. Check the 1-year date of every lot, since a lot held 11 months is taxed at ordinary income rates and one more month would change that. Waiting for the price to recover first is the slowest option of all, because a 30% drop already needs a 43% gain to get back.

Does one paycheck or an early exit move the 2-year line?

Yes, your household's income and timeline can move the line. For a single earner like Carol, who files head of household, a job loss and a stock drop hit the same income, so a cap below 2 years is reasonable. Two spouses at the same employer face the same double exposure.

Two incomes from different employers can carry the full 2-year line, because one paycheck keeps paying the bills. Larger balances change the percentage but not the logic: with $5 million and $150,000 of spending, 2 years allows about $600,000, only 12% of net worth. The test tightens in percentage terms as wealth grows only if spending stays flat.

Early retirement shortens the line. If withdrawals start within 3 years, use 1 year of spending, because there's no salary left to wait out a recovery. One honest limit: the test measures the portfolio only. It doesn't price in losing your job while the stock falls, so anyone whose role is at risk should set a lower cap, and it needs a real spending number, which is hard to pin down while household costs are changing.

Test 4 beliefs that keep people over the line

"I'll sell when it gets back to my high." That price may not return, and every quarter of waiting is a quarter at full exposure.

"The tax bill is the reason to hold." Long-term gains tax is paid on the gain only, while a 50% drop takes half of the whole value. Put both in dollars before you decide which one is bigger.

"I know this company." Insiders know the product. They don't know next year's multiple, and blackout rules limit when they can act on what they know.

"Unvested RSUs don't count yet." They become shares on a schedule, so leaving them out understates the position you'll hold in 12 months.

Sell down in 5 steps, then put these questions to your plan administrator and CPA

Work in this order. 1) Add up vested shares, the 401(k) stock fund and the next 12 months of vests. 2) Write annual spending as one number. 3) Apply the 2-year test to get a dollar cap. 4) Rank lots by gain and holding date. 5) Set the 10b5-1 schedule and give a copy of the playbook to your CPA.

Decision rule: if cutting your total employer exposure in half would erase more than 2 years of household spending, sell down until it wouldn't. Use 1 year instead if withdrawals start within 3 years. The related pages on RSU tax planning and ESPP selling strategy cover the tax side of each lot, and exchange funds are compared with selling in a separate article.

  • Plan administrator: when does the next trading window open, and what cooling-off period applies to my role?
  • CPA: which lots cross the 1-year mark in the next 6 months, and should I make estimated tax payments on planned sales?
  • Advisor: does the 2-year cap change if my bonus is paid in stock, and how do the 401(k) stock fund sales fit the order?

What Edward Jones Investments checks first in your accounts

Edward Jones Investments starts with 2 numbers side by side: total employer exposure across the portal, the 401(k) and unvested grants, and household spending for 1 year. Next it ranks each lot by its cost basis and the date it was acquired, so the first sales move the most exposure for the least tax. That's a review of your situation, not a promise of any result.

Related questions

My dad has most of his savings in the stock of the company he's worked at for 20 years; what number should worry me?

Worry when half of his company stock, taken together with his 401(k) shares, would erase more than 2 years of his household spending. A man spending $100,000 annually with $700,000 in one stock loses $350,000 in a 50% drop, or 3.5 years of spending. If he's near retirement, use 1 year as the line.

My employer offers a company stock fund in the 401(k); should I count it toward my limit on company stock?

Yes, count it. Shares in the 401(k) company stock fund ride on the same employer as your paycheck, vested shares and unvested RSUs. Add all of them before you apply the 2-year test. Selling inside the 401(k) creates no current income tax, so that fund can often be reduced first.

Official references

This material is general information only and does not address any individual's investment, tax or legal situation. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Before acting on any information here, speak with a financial advisor, tax professional or attorney about your circumstances.

Request a conversation